Log in

No account? Create an account

Wed, Mar. 21st, 2007, 08:56 am
Ah man..

I missed two questions. Damn timed tests. One of those I didn't click quick enough. The other.. who knows. I'm not sure if it was a math or perception one I missed.

I was a bit confused about the context of one question, 4 < x < 6 and 4 < y < 6. What is the max value that x+y can be. A:8, B:9, C:10, D:11 I took 'D'. They may have assumed X and Y were integer? Or course, they don't tell which ones were right and which were wrong, so...

Anyway, I managed an IQ of 141 with 58 out of 60 correct.


Hopefully we aren't skewing the canadian statistics too much.
(Deleted comment)

Wed, Mar. 21st, 2007 01:54 pm (UTC)

Why wouldn't 5.5 + 5.5 equal 11?

grrr... I ran into places like this on the college board SAT tests too. The phrasing of the questions are not sufficiently qualified to justify their answers.

So, really, I got every question I answered correct.
(Deleted comment)

Wed, Mar. 21st, 2007 07:05 pm (UTC)

If they hadn't had previous questions which dealt with decimals and fractions and such, I may not have considered 5.5, although that is the type of thing I deal with at work all the time, so I probably still would have gone with 11.

I would have preferred to have directly gotten the points, but I am content to know I was right and the test maker was wrong.
(Deleted comment)

Wed, Mar. 21st, 2007 07:51 pm (UTC)

Clearly, I provided a counter example to disprove is 'correct' answer. That is about as wrong as it gets.

The question didn't specify whole numbers or even natural numbers. Without a qualifier or context to limit the values of x and y to a particular domain, one is left with Real numbers. 5.4 + 5.6 = 11 and 4 < 5.4 < 6 and 4 < 5.6 < 6

If this was a test that would be used over the long term I'm sure they be happy for the feedback so they could correct and update their test.

Thu, Mar. 22nd, 2007 07:58 pm (UTC)

I got bored and clicked outta it...I think I was on question 20 something...I think I need Ritalin...lol.

Fri, Mar. 23rd, 2007 10:42 am (UTC)

It does have a couple slow sections.